Quoted Text

Mursi: Recognition Of Peace Agreement With Israel – Conditional; MB Calls For Jihad To Liberate Palestine

Throughout his campaign and also since his election, Egyptian President Muhammad Mursi has stated that he accepts the peace agreement with Israel. For example, in a meeting with newspaper editors following his election, he said that Egypt would honor the agreement,[1] and in his inauguration speech at Cairo University, he said that he carried a message of peace to the world, that he would uphold Egypt's commitments as part of international treaties and conventions it has signed, and that "Egypt [would] never turn to a policy of aggression."[2]

At the same time, Mursi is careful to qualify his statements and say that Egypt's acceptance of the peace agreement depends on Israel's honoring of this agreement – an assertion that is open to various interpretations. For example, in a televised interview before the elections, he said that Israel's honoring the agreement meant making peace with all the peoples of the region, implementing the Palestinians' right of return, and establishing a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.[3] On another occasion, he said that Israel's attack on Gaza constituted a violation of the peace agreement..........................>>>>.................>>>>....................http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6535.htm

I don't see the big deal, he's talking out of both sides of his mouth to try and appease everyone politically. No different from our mainstream candidates.

Quoted from A Better Rotterdam

I don't see the big deal, he's talking out of both sides of his mouth to try and appease everyone politically. No different from our mainstream candidates.

The President isn't calling for the Jihad, the Muslim Brotherhood is.

He stated he want Israel to honor the agreement.

The interpretation of the agreement is the current issue.

The agreement demands Israel make peace with it's neighbors.

peace by definition by ANY human being is 'everything being just as it should be.'.....it's subjective....keeping conversation
is about as civil as society can be because WE ARE A BUNCH OF INDIVIDUALS THAT DETEST state subjectivity/projection