Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Schonowe Proposes $3.3M Firehouse - REJECTED
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Schonowe Proposes $3.3M Firehouse - REJECTED Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 42 Guests

Schonowe Proposes $3.3M Firehouse - REJECTED  This thread currently has 5,041 views. |
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
senders
July 19, 2012, 7:51am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
This opinion represents the views of the Office of the State Comptroller at the time it was rendered. The opinion may no longer represent those views if, among other things, there have been subsequent court cases or statutory amendments that bear on the issues discussed in the opinion.



AMBULANCE SERVICE - - Contracts (by fire district for “back up” services with private ambulance company) -- Fees (imposition of by fire districts for “back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company) -- Fire Districts (contracts for “back up” services with private ambulance company)

FEES -- Imposition of (by fire districts for “back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company)

FIRE DISTRICTS -- Ambulance Service (“back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company); (imposition of fees for “back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company) – Powers and Duties (contract for “back up” services provided by private ambulance company); (imposition of fees for “back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company); (by fire districts for “back up” services provided under contract with private ambulance company)

GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW §§ 122-b (5), 209-b (3-a) (a): A fire district that has in its fire department an emergency first aid and rescue squad comprised mainly of volunteer firefighters may authorize the squad to contract with “ambulance services,” as defined in Public Health Law § 3001 (2) and (3), to provide services when the squad is unavailable. In addition, a fire district may contract with an appropriate private ambulance company for prehospital treatment if: (1) the fire district, as a part of a fire protection contract, provides general and/or emergency ambulance service pursuant to General Municipal Law § 209-b and article 30 of the Public Health Law, (2) a town or village has not designated itself as the primary provider of, or otherwise contracted for, an emergency ambulance, a general ambulance service or a combination of such services acting individually or jointly, and (3) the services are limited to the furnishing of supplemental personnel, equipment or service to cover instances or periods of time when the fire district's service may not be readily available. In neither situation, however, may a fee be imposed upon the person served for the services provided under the contract with the private ambulance company.

You ask whether a fire district may enter into a contract with an incorporated private voluntary ambulance service under which the ambulance service would provide emergency medical services to the fire district. The ambulance service would also bill and collect fees that would be charged to the users of the services, and retain the fees for its own use and benefit.

Initially, we note that it is a fundamental principle that fire districts only have those powers expressly granted by statute or necessarily implied therefrom (Town Law § 176 [21]; see e.g. 2008 Ops St Comp No. 2008-3; 2003 Ops St Comp No. 2003-4, at 10; cf. Wells v Town of Salina, 119 NY 280). There are several statutes that authorize fire districts to contract to receive emergency medical services. A fire district whose own fire department has not been authorized to render emergency ambulance service 1may contract to obtain that service from another city, town, village or fire district that has in its fire department an emergency rescue and first aid squad duly authorized to render emergency ambulance service (General Municipal Law § 209-b [1] [b]). In addition, a fire district, as part of a fire protection contract with a city, village or fire district, or an incorporated fire company having its headquarters outside the district, may contract for emergency ambulance service (Town Law § 176 [22]). If the fire department or fire company furnishing fire protection under the contract does not maintain and operate an ambulance, the fire district may separately contract for emergency ambulance service with a city, village, fire district or fire company under certain circumstances (id.).

Prior to 2003, fire districts were not authorized to contract to receive emergency medical services from an entity other than a fire department or fire company, such as from a private ambulance company (1998 Ops St Comp No. 98-21, at 51). Chapter 378 of the Laws of 2003, however, added subdivision 3-a to General Municipal Law § 209-b and subdivision 5 to General Municipal Law § 122-b, to provide limited grants of authority for fire districts to contract with, among other entities, private “commercial” ambulance companies to receive “back-up” services (see New York State Assembly Mem in Support of Legislation, Budget Report on Bills, Letter to Counsel to the Governor, United New York Ambulance Network, August 15, 2003, Bill Jacket, L 2003, ch 378, at 3, 4 and 10, respectively).

Under General Municipal Law § 209-b (3-a) (a), a fire district that has in its fire department an emergency first aid and rescue squad comprised mainly of volunteer firefighters may authorize the squad to contract with “ambulance services,” as defined in Public Health Law § 3001 (2) and (3), 2 to provide services when the squad is unavailable. 3 Subdivision 5 of General Municipal Law § 122-b provides as follows:

Fire districts, which, as part of a fire protection contract, may provide general ambulance and/or emergency ambulance service pursuant to section two hundred nine-b of this chapter and article thirty of the public health law where a town or village has not designated itself as the primary provider of or otherwise contracted for an emergency ambulance, a general ambulance service, or a combination of such service acting individually or jointly, may contract with one or more individuals, municipal corporations, or other organizations having sufficient trained personnel, vehicles or combination of personnel and vehicles suitable to provide prehospital emergency treatment, for the furnishing of supplemental personnel, equipment or service to cover instances or periods of time when its service may not be readily available.



Thus, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 122-b (5), fire districts may contract with, among others, appropriate private ambulance companies for prehospital treatment, but only if: (1) the fire district, as a part of a fire protection contract, provides general and/or emergency ambulance service pursuant to General Municipal Law § 209-b and article 30 of the Public Health Law, 4 (2) a town or village has not designated itself as the primary provider of, or otherwise contracted for, an emergency ambulance, a general ambulance service or a combination of such services acting individually or jointly, and (3) the services are limited to the furnishing of “supplemental personnel, equipment or service to cover instances or periods of time when its [the fire district's] service may not be readily available.”

Even if the fire district here meets the requirements of General Municipal Law §§ 209-b (3-a) or 122-b (5) for contracting with a private ambulance company for “back-up” emergency medical services, however, there is no authority in either statute for the imposition of fees upon users of the fire district's contracted services, whether the fees are billed and collected by the private ambulance company or by the fire district. General Municipal Law § 122-b (1) authorizes a county, town, village or city, but not a fire district, to provide an emergency medical service, general ambulance service or a combination of such services for the purpose of providing prehospital emergency treatment or transporting sick or injured person found within the boundaries “of the municipality” to a place for treatment. General Municipal Law § 122-b (2) authorizes “[s]uch municipality” to fix a schedule of fees and charges to be paid by persons requesting use of the services, and provide for the collection of the fees and charges or formulate rules and regulations for the collection of the fees and charges by organizations providing the service under contract. It is evident that the term “such municipality” as used in General Municipal Law § 122-b (2) in the grant of authority for the imposition of fees is intended to refer back to the cities, towns, villages and counties authorized under General Municipal Law § 122-b (1) to provide emergency medical and general ambulance services (see also General Municipal Law § 2 [defining the term “municipal corporation,” as used in the General Municipal Law, to include only a county, town, city and village]).

In contrast to General Municipal Law § 122-b (2), there is no indication in General Municipal Law § 122-b (5), General Municipal Law § 209-b (3-a), or the legislative history of chapter 378 of the Laws of 2003, to suggest that fees may be imposed upon users of the fire district services provided under contracts pursuant to those provisions. 5 In fact, General Municipal Law § 209-b (4) expressly states that emergency and general ambulance services authorized pursuant to section 209-b must be furnished without cost to the person served. 6

Accordingly, a fire district that has in its fire department an emergency first aid and rescue squad comprised mainly of volunteer firefighters may authorize the squad to contract with “ambulance services,” as defined in Public Health Law § 3001 (2) and (3), to provide services when the squad is unavailable. In addition, a fire district may contract with an appropriate private ambulance company for prehospital treatment if: (1) the fire district, as a part of a fire protection contract, may provide general and/or emergency ambulance service pursuant to General Municipal Law § 209-b and article 30 of the Public Health Law, (2) a town or village has not designated itself as the primary provider of, or otherwise contracted for, an emergency ambulance, a general ambulance service or a combination of such services acting individually or jointly, and (3) the services are limited to the furnishing of supplemental personnel, equipment or service to cover instances or periods of time when the fire district's service may not be readily available. In neither situation, however, may a fee be imposed upon the person served for the services provided under the contract with the private ambulance company.



November 22, 2010

Ronald P. Bennett, Esq., Town Attorney
Town of Holland



1General Municipal Law § 209-b authorizes the board of fire commissioners of a fire district to organize, within the fire district fire department, emergency rescue and first aid squads composed of firefighters who are members of the department (General Municipal Law §209-b[1][a]). The squad may render services in cases of accidents, calamities or other emergencies in connection with which the services of firefighters may be required (id.).

2Public Health Law § 3001 (2) defines “[a]mbulance service" to mean “an individual, partnership, association, corporation, municipality or any legal or public entity or subdivision thereof engaged in providing emergency medical care and the transportation of sick or injured persons by motor vehicle, aircraft or other forms of transportation to, from, or between general hospitals or other health care facilities.” Public Health Law § 3001 (3) defines “[v]oluntary ambulance service” to mean “an ambulance service (i) operating not for pecuniary profit or financial gain, and (ii) no part of the assets or income of which is distributable to, or enures to the benefit of, its members, directors or officers except to the extent permitted under this article.”

3 General Municipal Law § 209-b (3-a) (a) also authorizes “mutual aid agreements,” as defined in Public Health Law § 3001 (20).

4 General Municipal Law § 122-b (5) literally states, as one of the criteria that must be met in order for a fire district to contract for supplemental service, that the fire district, “as part of a fire protection contract, may provide ” general or emergency ambulance service (emphasis added). This provision could be read to mean that the fire district merely must have the authority to contract to provide such services, and not that the fire district, in fact, has contracted to provide the ambulance services. It is evident, however, that, when General Municipal Law § 122-b (5) is read as a whole, the purpose of the amendment is to give a fire district that has actually agreed to provide ambulance services as part of a fire protection contract the authority to contract for supplemental services for situations when the fire district's own services to be provided under the fire protection contract are not “readily available” (see also State of New York Department of State, Approval Mem, July 14, 2003, Bill Jacket, L 2003, ch 378, at 5).

5 It should also be noted that the fees imposed pursuant to General Municipal Law § 122-b (2) are municipal charges for a municipal function, and constitute monies of the town, village, city or county, as the case may be (1998 Ops St Comp No. 98-9, at 22). Although section 122-b (2) authorizes the municipality to provide, in rules and regulations, for the collection of the fees and charges by the contracting service provider, the service provider should remit the monies collected to the municipality (2005 Ops St Comp No. 2005-1, at 1, footnote 1). Therefore, even if the authorization for the imposition of fees in General Municipal Law § 122-b (2) were to apply here, the fees would not be retained by the ambulance company.

6 General Municipal Law § 209-b (4) further provides, as noted in the letter of inquiry, that the acceptance by any firefighter of any personal remuneration or gratuity, directly or indirectly, from a person served shall be a ground for expulsion or suspension as a member of the fire department or fire company. The letter of inquiry also notes that the not-for-profit corporation in question would be formed by members of the fire district fire department, and that the services would be provided by members of the fire department who would also be members of the ambulance corporation (see 1997 Ops St Comp No. 97-23, at 43 [no statutory prohibition against an individual becoming a member of a volunteer fire company and a volunteer ambulance corps at the same time]). For purposes of this inquiry, we assume that all services by such individuals would be performed solely in their discrete capacities as members of an ambulance corps, separate and distinct from the fire department, and not in their capacities as volunteer firefighters. In that case, it would appear that the prohibition in General Municipal Law § 209-b (4) against the acceptance of gratuities by a volunteer firefighter would not be relevant to this inquiry (see Mem of Joint Legis Comm on Fire Laws, 1957 McKinney's Session Law of NY, at 2171 [purpose of General Municipal Law § 209-b (4), in part, was to prohibit acceptance of any remuneration or gratuity by a firefighter for services by an “emergency relief squad,” now referred to in General Municipal Law § 209-b as “emergency rescue and first aid squads”] .




...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 22
senders
July 19, 2012, 7:58am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
1. Irrespective of the manner of its original establishment,
  whenever a board of fire commissioners resolves, by a  two-thirds  vote,
  to  diminish  the  boundaries  of  such  fire district, so as to exclude
  territory previously situate within such  fire  district,  and  after  a
  public  hearing  thereon, held jointly by the fire district and the town
  in which such territory to be excluded is  situate,  the  boundaries  of
  such fire district may be altered in accordance with such resolution.
    2.   Such  resolution  of  proposed  diminution  shall  be  signed  by
  two-thirds of the members of the board of fire commissioners  and  shall
  be acknowledged or approved in the same manner as a deed to be recorded.
  The  members  of  the  board  of fire commissioners shall jointly hold a
  public hearing with  the  members  of  the  town  board  in  which  such
  territory is located and shall cause a notice thereof to be published at
  least  once  in  a newspaper having general circulation in the territory
  affected. The first publication thereof shall be not less than ten  days
  nor  more  than  twenty  days  before the day designated therein for the
  hearing. Such notice shall specify the time when and the place where the
  board of fire commissioners and the town board will  meet  to  hear  all
  persons  interested  in  the  subject,  and  shall specify the territory
  affected. Cost  of  publication  shall  be  borne  solely  by  the  fire
  district.  Such  notice  shall also specify the area to be included in a
  proposed fire protection district, which fire protection district  shall
  include the area of the fire district proposed to be excluded.
    3.  After a hearing held upon notice as hereinbefore provided and upon
  the evidence given thereat, the board of fire commissioners and the town
  board shall determine by resolution: (a) Whether all  the  property  and
  property  owners  within  the  area  proposed  to  be  excluded from the
  district and included in the  fire  protection  district  are  benefited
  thereby;
    (b)  Whether  all  the  property  and  property  owners  benefited are
  included within the limits of the proposed fire protection district;
    (c) Whether it is in the public interest to grant in whole or in  part
  the  diminution  of the district and the creation of the fire protection
  district by the town board.
    If the board of fire commissioners and the town board shall  determine
  that  it  is  in  the  public interest to diminish the fire district and
  create the fire protection district but shall  find  that  any  part  or
  portion  of  the property or property owners within the proposed area to
  be excluded from the fire district are not  benefited  thereby  or  that
  certain  property  or  property  owners  benefited thereby have not been
  included in the proposed fire protection district,  the  board  of  fire
  commissioners  and the town board shall specify the necessary changes of
  the boundaries of the area to be excluded from the fire district and the
  boundaries of the fire protection  district  in  order  that  only  such
  property  and property owners as are benefited, shall be included within
  such proposed excluded area and within the fire protection district, and
  the board of fire commissioners shall, together  with  the  town  board,
  call  a  further  hearing  at  a  definite  place and time not less than
  fifteen nor more than twenty-five days after such determination.  Notice
  of such further hearing shall be published in  the  manner  provided  in
  this  section  except  that such notice shall also specify the manner in
  which it is proposed to alter the boundaries of the area to be  excluded
  and the boundaries of the fire protection district. Such further hearing
  shall  be  conducted in the same manner as the original hearing. If, and
  when, the board of fire commissioners and the town board shall determine
  in the affirmative all of the questions set forth in  this  subdivision,
  the  board  of  fire  commissioners may adopt a resolution approving the

  diminution of  the  fire  district  and  the  town  board  may  adopt  a
  resolution  approving the establishment of the fire protection district,
  all as the boundaries shall be finally determined.


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 22
senders
July 19, 2012, 7:58am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 22
pituch531
August 17, 2012, 11:47am Report to Moderator
Baby Member
Posts
1
Time Online
1 hours 42 minutes
Please remember to come out and vote on August 21 from 6-9pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 22
GrahamBonnet
August 17, 2012, 12:39pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
very quiet thanks to gazette who never met a public debt they didnt want to see the people incur.

VOTE NO


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 19 - 22
Admin
August 23, 2012, 4:43am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
ROTTERDAM
Voters reject firehouse proposal

BY JUSTIN MASON Gazette Reporter

    Voters soundly defeated a $3.25 million proposal to build a new station for the Schonowe Fire Department.
    The resolution was shot down Tuesday by a vote of 166-114. Fire Commissioner Barry Gray said the board will now need to decide whether to make repairs to the ag- ing building to bring it up to code or go without using the second fl oor, which was cited by the state Public Employee Safety and Health Department earlier this year.
    “That’s got to be determined,” he said Wednesday.
    The 22-member company was proposing to build a 12,200-squarefoot, three-bay facility in the parking lot adjacent to the existing building. The old building would have been demolished as part of the project.
    Fire officials were hoping to replace the station on Gordon Road with a structure that would better support modern fi re equipment. Built in 1948, the old station is lacking in space and is aligned on the property in a manner that makes it diffi cult to park fire vehicles inside.
    The total cost of the project would have been bonded out over 25 years and cost residents 87 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value. The owner of a $200,000 home would have paid an additional $174 each year under the proposal.
    The Schonowe proposal is the second major firehouse project to be shot down by voters in less than a year. In October, voters in the Pine Grove Fire District rejected a $3.5 million plan to renovate the 30-member company’s existing station and add 4,200 square-feet of space.
    Gray said Schonowe members didn’t conduct any exit polls to gauge why the resolution was rejected and were surprised by the outcome. He suspected low turnout — about 35 percent of registered voters in the district — played a role.
    Gray said the company will need to decide whether to conduct extensive repairs to the building so they can continue using the second floor. The meeting room is already closed to the public and will be offlimits to the fire company after June 2013, when the waiver allowing them to use the space expires.
    Gray said the company would need to build a new staircase and elevator to continue using the space. In addition, he said the rest rooms would need to be moved and the kitchen updated, projects that still don’t address the functionality of the building as a fi rehouse.
    “The Board of Commissioners is going to have to sit down and discuss what avenue we want to take,” he said.


http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r01305&AppName=1
Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 22
GrahamBonnet
August 23, 2012, 11:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
those meanies want the kids to die


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 21 - 22
Libertarian4life
August 23, 2012, 2:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
those meanies want the kids to die


The owners of the tax dollars have spoken.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 22 - 22
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Schonowe Proposes $3.3M Firehouse - REJECTED

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread