Quoted from mikechristine1

But then, we all know, DV would ONLY remove signs from a cemetery if the signs endorse someone he does not favor

This appears to be true since dvr has no problem with the REUNITE dems, Mike Viscusi and Wayne Calder, placing their signs on church property. And conveniently during the church's fall festival.

However, everyone in rotterdam can blame ALL of the dems for ALL of these signs. The majority of the signs are those that are REIGNITING the rotterdam democrat party. It is almost humorous to drive through rotterdam and see dem signs that are in opposition of themselves!  

Rotterdam is known to be a sh!thole and laughing stock........now it actually LOOKS like one. SUCCESS!

And the rotterdamians can thank the dems who are REIGNITING themselves in word, action and now signage!!

The FACT is that in the past, I have removed signs of ALL political persuasions from the road along the fence of my parish's cemetery.   Our parish does NOT endorse any political candidates and does NOT allow the signs of ANY political party to be placed on its property.

The Nattering Nayboobs will continue to lie and say otherwise -- but then they wouldn't know the truth if it bit em on their hindquarters.   Also - they continue to prove their ability to engage in normal rational  adult conversation and debate.  One can only help that they seek professional help for this problem.

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

Also - they continue to prove their ability to engage in normal rational  adult conversation and debate.  

and that is exactly why you have such a hard time understanding anything that is said....because these are RATIONAL ADULT conversations, not for idiots like you

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

The FACT is that in the past, I have removed signs of ALL political persuasions from the road along the fence of my parish's cemetery.   Our parish does NOT endorse any political candidates and does NOT allow the signs of ANY political party to be placed on its property.

Now that you've admitted to stealing private property, we you asked by the administrators of the cemetery or the pastor of the church to do that - or did you just make that determination on your own?

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

Sorry that your planned political attack and subsequent threat didn't pan out Ron.

I made absolutely no political attack and some of the signs by churches have since come down ... so I would say I have been partially successful.

Quoted from 147

Now that you've admitted to stealing private property, we you asked by the administrators of the cemetery or the pastor of the church to do that - or did you just make that determination on your own?

No one stole private property -- the items were left on private property where they did not belong.  

I am under no obligation to answer any questions that you may ask -- including those about conversations that I have had with any other person(s).

Of course he takes it on himself to pretend to have authority. He is the man-boy of all unaccomplished child-men, living in a dreamscape where he is actually important somehow, to someone.

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

Of course he takes it on himself to pretend to have authority. He is the man-boy of all unaccomplished child-men, living in a dreamscape where he is actually important somehow, to someone.

auntie perhaps?

Quoted from Admin

Emailed for posting:


St. Gabriel's Church



Abounding Grace Church

Abounding grace just may get a pass as it looks to not be on THEIR property. St. Gabriels on the other hand, is not only ON their property....but.....right in front of the door!!!

This will lead people to think that the church is favoring one political party or candidate over another....hence......people just may begin to think that the church is being bought out by donations from this party and/or candidate. In this case the democon party....Mike Viscusi and Wayne Calder. But then again the town's website did promote st. gabriel's fall festival last year....i don't know if they did the same this year. Makes folks wonder in a way that they shouldn't.

Both should lose their NPO designation, immediately.

Quoted from 147

Both should lose their NPO designation, immediately.

I agree....then perhaps they can become the new rotterdam gossip center...yes?

A blatant attempt to get people to think they are the "church-endorsed" candidates. We need an explanation from the democrap officials about this NOW!

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

A blatant attempt to get people to think they are the "church-endorsed" candidates. We need an explanation from the democrap officials about this NOW!

You also need an explanation from the church since they allowed this and have also allowed themselves to possibly losing their tax exempt status.

I am not in favor of punishing them, as Ronald Severson is and has threatened in a not so subtle way. Because they ca\n't be privy to what a loosely confederated group of campaign volunteers is doing at every moment. However, it seems his suggestion has caught fire. The democraps themselves started the problem and in a vain attempt to smear the opposition, have caught the church in a crossfire. Too bad.