The second that I clicked to play the video, Norton notified me the website was trying to install an unsafe file in my computer and immediately deleted it.
Now when I load the web page, the video no longer even appears.
The second that I clicked to play the video, Norton notified me the website was trying to install an unsafe file in my computer and immediately deleted it.
Now when I load the web page, the video no longer even appears.
Sorry about that the link and video work with no problem on my computer
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
The link worked fine for me, wonder why ok for some and not for others?
Windows 7 and 8 are unaffected by iframe exploit.
Also Known As: Exploit-Mime.gen [McAfee], Exploit/iFrame [Panda]
Type: Worm
Systems Affected: Windows 2000, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows XP
I'm still running XP. I haven't upgraded because I use system recovery as soon as my system begins to run slow, making it factory original.
I paid almost $3,000 for my tower in 2005 from CompUSA. It was the best computer they sold in the store. It came with windows media center and cable tv tuner/recording capabilities, lightscribe DVD system and the speed is 2.80ghz, which used to be fast. It also came with removable extra hard drives and was nearly 1 terabyte altogether. That was a lot in 2005. I have added more external hard drives since then as well. I keep everything on the externals and removables, then when I restore to factory original, I don't lose anything. I can bring my entire system back to new in one day, reinstalling all the extras that didn't come from the factory.
Many people I know have new machines that aren't as fast as this one. I will upgrade when I can get a good deal on an overclocked gaming computer with the processor running around 5ghz and at least 32gbs of ram. That should keep me ahead of the curve for a few years.
L4L you know alot about computers like my brother : ) Have you seen the Alienware computers very nice but very pricey.
My computer went a few months ago, bought one at Staples very cheap as computers go. Was infected by an evil trojan, had to go back to factory settings to get rid of it
Former presidential candidate Ron Paul, a longtime foe of the Federal Reserve and champion of a smaller foreign policy footprint, is turning to education in a new book slated for release this fall.
In “New School Manifesto,” scheduled for a Sept. 17 release from Grand Central Publishing, the former GOP congressman from Texas will promote home schooling and “free market principles applied to education,” according to an official book description.
“He makes the case for individual freedoms as they pertain to educating our children, and nimbly dissects the most pressing issues that need to be addressed from the libertarian point of view,” the description continues.
This will be Paul’s fourth book with Grand Central Publishing, following “Liberty Defined,” “End the Fed” and “The Revolution: A Manifesto,” his editor, Ben Greenberg, told POLITICO. Greenberg said the book has been in the works for close to a year, and that a deal for its publication was hammered out in January.
In this book, Greenberg said, Paul will compare the postal service to the education system, arguing that in both realms, competition promotes better services.
“He’s basically saying the postal service didn’t have many competitors until FedEx, UPS and email, obviously, and now it’s changing the way everything gets done,” Greenberg said. “He’s arguing for that in education as well.”
Paul will address a variety of education policy proposals, he said.
“He’s taking the position that a parent should have the ability to choose what is best,” Greenberg said, a philosophy that would include home schooling.
Greenberg, who has edited all of Paul’s books done through Grand Central Publishing, said the Texan is “really easy to work with” and doesn’t require heavy editing.
“We usually do two to three edits for the main script, but not much,” Greenberg said. “His ideas are pretty fully formed. It’s just a matter of honing in and making sure everything is in the right order and just figuring out how to best say the message without becoming too repetitive or anything like that.”
Also on deck for the libertarian former lawmaker: talk radio. Courtside Entertainment Group announced this month that in March, Paul will offer “twice daily one-minute radio commentaries” with his talks also available as a weekly podcast.
“Even if you don’t agree with what he says, he always makes you think about things a little bit differently,” Greenberg added.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Mini-Me, Sen. Rand Paul ‘not familiar with the details’ of anti-abortion bill he sponsored!
Quoted Text
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on Wednesday claimed to be ignorant of the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, even though he sponsored the legislation twice.
At a press event in Kentucky, LEO Weekly asked Paul why he supported the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, but not the Violence Against Women Act. Paul replied he was “not familiar with the details” of the anti-abortion bill.
The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act would make it a federal crime for any adult to transport a minor across state lines to have an abortion without the consent of her parents. Paul cosponsored the bill in 2011 and again in 2013.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Mini-Me, Sen. Rand Paul ‘not familiar with the details’ of anti-abortion bill he sponsored!
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on Wednesday claimed to be ignorant of the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, even though he sponsored the legislation twice.
At a press event in Kentucky, LEO Weekly asked Paul why he supported the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, but not the Violence Against Women Act. Paul replied he was “not familiar with the details” of the anti-abortion bill.
The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act would make it a federal crime for any adult to transport a minor across state lines to have an abortion without the consent of her parents. Paul cosponsored the bill in 2011 and again in 2013.
Here is the unbiased LEO Weekly "news" article that this came from.
Quoted Text
Rand Paul claims to not know anything about the abortion legislation he’s co-sponsoring
Sen. Rand Paul visited Fourth Street Live yesterday with a giant cardboard check made out to the big bad federal government for $600,000, money his Senate office saved by cutting back on staff for constituent services. After belatedly answering questions from the press about running for president and supporting Sen. Mitch McConnell’s re-election over his possible Tea Party challenger (the Tea Party is so 2010) — as well as planted supporters shouting over the press about how great he is — Paul was asked why he was one of 22 GOP male senators to vote against the re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act last week.
According to Paul, his opposition to the bill was rooted in VAWA requiring “borrowing money from China,” adding that he thinks such domestic violence efforts should be handled and funded completely at the state level and by private charities, not the federal government. Paul dodged LEO’s question on whether he thought the bill was unconstitutional, but as we noted last week, he has no problem telling his buds in the wacky “Men’s Rights Activists” movement that it violates the Constitution.
But how can Paul say the federal government shouldn’t get involved with criminal laws at the state level when he also supports amending the Constitution to criminalize abortion at the federal level, and is the co-sponsor of legislation like the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, which can put doctors in jail for a year if they perform an abortion for a minor who crosses state lines to have the procedure without the presence and consent of her parents? (This bill also has no exemption for rape and incest, meaning if a father rapes and impregnates his daughter, she can’t have an abortion unless he goes with her and OKs it. It’s a family values, thing…)
We decided to ask Sen. Paul why he’s OK with the federal government getting involved to save fetuses but doesn’t think such protection should be given to grown women facing violence. His answer — or lack thereof — was kind of amazing:
LEO: You support the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act. Why is action like that good on the federal level, but not the Violence…
Paul: (interrupts) I’m not familiar with the details on that, anybody else?
LEO: But you’re a sponsor of the legislation?
Paul turned his head and refused to look at me, as he waited a few seconds for someone else to ask a question.
So one would have to assume that Paul is just blatantly lying here, since he has banged his drum the past four years demanding that congressmen “read the bills” before voting for them, right?
After a few more questions, I followed up:
LEO: How are you not familiar with a bill you’re sponsoring?
Paul: I think you’ve already had yours. Anybody else?
LEO: Did you read it?
Paul: Alright, thanks guys.
And with that, Paul ended the presser and darted off. This happens to be the second time in a row he’s refused to answer a question from LEO about his abortion policy stance and abruptly ended a presser because of it.
It’s funny, because Rand Paul loves to speak in front of influential conservative groups in D.C. and Iowa — groups his father could never win over but he plans on successfully wooing — about how much he’s going to fight for draconian abortion policy on the federal level, yet when asked very simple questions about abortion back home by the media, he turns mute and storms off.
I wonder if those anti-choice groups are impressed by Paul’s refusal to testify to about the “genocide” of “babies” when given the opportunity, or if they’ll be troubled by his peculiar situational amnesia?
Either way, it seems pretty clear Rand is both a liar and a coward.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Logged
