So are they supposed to send committee meeting announcements as certified letters with a return reciept card?

Quoted from Penalty Kick

I read the papers and based on my reading GP tried to get the records from the chair and the secretary and because they DID NOT RESPOND he filed the lawsuit because it was the last day to file it...Was he supposed to let them not respond, wait until the statute of limitations expired and for them to not aknowledge the fact that rules were broken?

Did GP send a letter to the Chair formally requesting to reschedule the committee meeting?  He does claim he received the letter 3 day before the meeting.  I would think that's plenty of time to make a request for a new date.

Quoted from CICERO

Did GP send a letter to the Chair formally requesting to reschedule the committee meeting?  He does claim he received the letter 3 day before the meeting.  I would think that's plenty of time to make a request for a new date.

wouldnt that have been a novel idea.  a lawyer offering constructive advice to the chair.  If his only concern was procedure why didnt call or email traceyand say hey you may have a problem with meeting notification, you may want to reschedule the meeting, in order to protect the integrity of the/his committee?  

thats why this is all bullsh!t - and those supporting this saying that GP is some seeker of truth and justice are so full of it

We'll see if the Judge thinks its BS...fortunately none of you mo rons are judges!  lol

He says it was received at his home 3 days prior...he also says he was out of town...who knows when he received it.

Tracy is a liar. She says GP wants to meet? That is an absolute lie...Tom Buchanan wants the meeting and Tracy will not go with it and continues to personally attack gerard

Here is an email that was sent to me

Tom Buchanan wrote:
> Tracy,
>
>
>
> I want to meet with you, me, Gerard, and James the Secretary, with all
> notes, and proxies in original.  Please contact James and find out
when
> it can be done.  Let's get this done asap.  I suggest Saturday
afternoon
> or Sunday afternoon.  I want to come to some agreement as to the facts
> at issue.  I will ask the county secretary for the current Rotterdam
> roster.  If there was a quorum, there was, if not, then we'll have to
> come to some agreement on how to move forward.  Based on the info that
I
> have, there was, but Mr. Parisi would like full disclosure, which I
> believe is reasonable.  Let's stop emailing on this and simply set up
a
> time to meet.
>
>
>
> Thanks

BTW I have also heard that TB agrees with GP that the notice was improper...It looks like the only ones that think the notice was proper are Tracy, husky, benny, cissy, bumble....

Quoted from greenlantern

We'll see if the Judge thinks its BS...fortunately none of you mo rons are judges!  lol

You don't have a clue if anyone here is a judge or not!

And since GP aired his dirty laundry in the media.........it is now in the hands of the 'court of public opinion'.

So live with it!

Quoted from black spidey

BTW I have also heard that TB agrees with GP that the notice was improper...It looks like the only ones that think the notice was proper are Tracy, husky, benny, cissy, bumble....

I don't care if it was proper.  I don't belong to a political party.  That's inner party bs as far as I'm concerned.  I'm just providing commentary based on the info I am hearing.  A former Chair filing a article 78 against the current Chair is comical and just another public display of GP's super ego, playing this out in the media so he can  say I told you so, and all of his little minions like FS can run around saying how smart he is and everybody else is just stupid in comparison.  I support Brian M, regardless how this plays out, and Brian has vowed to get on the ballot with or without the party, and has an army of people willing to carry petitions and his message to get Rotterdam back on track and out of the gutter politics of thievery, bribery, and political patronage.

Quoted from CICERO

I don't care if it was proper.  I don't belong to a political party.  That's inner party bs as far as I'm concerned.  I'm just providing commentary based on the info I am hearing.  A former Chair filing a article 78 against the current Chair is comical and just another public display of GP's super ego, playing this out in the media so he can  say I told you so, and all of his little minions like FS can run around saying how smart he is and everybody else is just stupid in comparison.  I support Brian M, regardless how this plays out, and Brian has vowed to get on the ballot with or without the party, and has an army of people willing to carry petitions and his message to get Rotterdam back on track and out of the gutter politics of thievery, bribery, and political patronage.

  AMEN!

Quoted from CICERO

I don't care if it was proper.  I don't belong to a political party.  That's inner party bs as far as I'm concerned.  I'm just providing commentary based on the info I am hearing.  A former Chair filing a article 78 against the current Chair is comical and just another public display of GP's super ego, playing this out in the media so he can  say I told you so, and all of his little minions like FS can run around saying how smart he is and everybody else is just stupid in comparison.  I support Brian M, regardless how this plays out, and Brian has vowed to get on the ballot with or without the party, and has an army of people willing to carry petitions and his message to get Rotterdam back on track and out of the gutter politics of thievery, bribery, and political patronage.

AMEN AND HALLELUJAH!!!

Its all inside baseball that is an embarrassment not the the current REP chair but the former chair. Especially after the town Assembly vote. No problem with procedure there? lol.  Even if what he alleged is true-so what? They will vote again with the exact same results.  

ARE YOU PEOPLE FU(KING SERIOUS!?!?!?!?! YOU ALL B!TCH AND MOAN ABOUT PROPRIETY AND HATE FDG AND HATE ST AND THIS ONE AND THAT ONE FOR DOING STUFF YOU THINK IS WRONG...NOW SOMETHING WRONG OCCURS CONCERNING YOUR GOLDEN BOY AND RATHER THAN JUST SAYING YEAP YOU'RE RIGHT THERE WAS AN ERROR AND WE WILL REDO IT YOU FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL AND CONTINUE TO DISPARAGE PEOPLE...YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES...PROCESS MATTERS IF IT'S AGAINST THE PERSON YOU HATE...BUT DOESN'T WHEN IT'S ON YOUR SIDE. DEPLORABLE!!!!!!!

Quoted from black spidey

Tracy is a liar. She says GP wants to meet? That is an absolute lie...Tom Buchanan wants the meeting and Tracy will not go with it and continues to personally attack gerard

Here is an email that was sent to me

Tom Buchanan wrote:
> Tracy,
>
>
>
> I want to meet with you, me, Gerard, and James the Secretary, with all
> notes, and proxies in original.  Please contact James and find out
when
> it can be done.  Let's get this done asap.  I suggest Saturday
afternoon
> or Sunday afternoon.  I want to come to some agreement as to the facts
> at issue.  I will ask the county secretary for the current Rotterdam
> roster.  If there was a quorum, there was, if not, then we'll have to
> come to some agreement on how to move forward.  Based on the info that
I
> have, there was, but Mr. Parisi would like full disclosure, which I
> believe is reasonable.  Let's stop emailing on this and simply set up
a
> time to meet.
>
>
>
> Thanks

---

I hope every has enough notice to make this meeting  

Quoted from littlesal

Wouldn't that have been a novel idea.  a lawyer offering constructive advice to the chair.  If his only concern was procedure why didn't call or email Tracy and say hey you may have a problem with meeting notification, you may want to reschedule the meeting, in order to protect the integrity of the/his committee?  

that's why this is all bullsh!t - and those supporting this saying that GP is some seeker of truth and justice are so full of it

That's why they are trying to walk it back. Too late-they stepped in it. Everyone is running from them.  They never cared about any by laws in the past. Now they are sticklers about process?