the property is in violation due to issues with its windows and doors

the spineless Greiesmer(GQ) is one of the leading causes of the down fall of this town in the last 10 years

properties on broadway, altamont ave and now this one should have been razed years ago

but,

it apears he is tooooooo afraid he will offend the property owner by billing them for the service of demolation at a prevailing wage via a mechanics lein on the property

Mr GQ should worry less about which chick he wants to impress(all the hot ones are married) and get to work

the list is getting longer:
water mains
sewer plant
sewer service
water tanks
fences on the town parks

for those who dont give a sh!t

shape up or ship out

"dont let schenectady happen here"

Another one of Steve T's inside circle!

Isn't this the house that went with the sale of counse's farm? I remember hearing it was a package deal.

who cares who's circle

the position serves the entire town not one or two residents, board members or administrators

when it comes to snow - this town gets it

when it comes to signs, falling down buildings  - this town fails

How about the corner of guilderland ave and curry in rotterdam? Now THAT looks like a war zone! Broken windows, burned buildings, siding falling off......safe?

I hear the 1stClassProducts site just cleared the insurance companies and will be cleared up as soon as the crews can get in safely to remove the debris (hopefully in the next few weeks). No word yet on rebuilding plans. Not sure on the apartments/stores on the corner.

Quoted from bumblethru

Isn't this the house that went with the sale of counse's farm? I remember hearing it was a package deal.

Correct, Flying J owns 880 and the farm (which also has multiple broken windows)...they are both a mess.  NAI Platform has the 'available' signs on the farm property but apparently no bites.

how about the green 2story house on Altamont.....are we just going to wait for it to fall into the street so that Rotterdam can get a spot on YNN?

Quoted from senders

how about the green 2story house on Altamont.....are we just going to wait for it to fall into the street so that Rotterdam can get a spot on YNN?

sure are

that building is tooooooo dangerous to tear down,  it is safer to just let it colapse.  

and let it sit there as a memorial to the quality of like in Rotterdam Past

Quoted from clubhouse

Correct, Flying J owns 880 and the farm (which also has multiple broken windows).

Not anymore. Flying J went belly up. I heard that Pilot bought them out.

Also the green house on altamont ave is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Has rotterdam's code enforcer/town supervisor, tried to contact the owner of the property?

Quoted from bumblethru

Not anymore. Flying J went belly up. I heard that Pilot bought them out.

Also the green house on altamont ave is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Has rotterdam's code enforcer/town supervisor, tried to contact the owner of the property?

Flyin J emerged from bankruptcy and merged with Pilot in June 2010

From the Legal Notices of today's Gazette:

NOTICE DIRECTING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF NEW YORK STATE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE - SECTION 304 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS To: Flying J Inc. Property: 880 Duanesburg Rd., Town of Rotterdam Tax Map #57.7-1-1-.2 Violation: 304.13 Windows door frames, 304.13.1 Glazing, 304.13.2 Openable windows, & 304.15 Doors : SECTION 304 General requirements To Wit: The subject property has been posted, the date of the posting is December 13, 2010. This structure is unsecured and has various elements relating to window glazing, doors and openings missing or in disrepair. Notice: 265-14B - Notice by Publication Notice is hereby given that the violations must be corrected within five (5) days. The five-day period shall commence on the sixth business day following the date of the second and final publication of this Notice. ACTION IN CASE OF NON-COMPLIANCE If the violation(s) are not corrected in a timely manner, the Town of Rotterdam will proceed with the removal and disposition of said violation(s) following the notice period and shall cause the costs of such removal and disposition to be charged against you and the subject property. This means that you will be personally liable for the costs incurred by the Town in correcting the violation(s) and/or that the costs of such corrections may be assessed against the real property by way of a lien. Pursuant to 265-15B, you may request a hearing before a review board on any matter you wish to address relating to the existence of the violation(s) and the removal thereof. The request for such a hearing must be made, in writing, before the expiration of the five-day notice. The request must be directed to Patrick Carroll Town Building Inspector/Code Enforcement Officer. If a hearing is requested no action will be taken by the Town until the completion of the hearing process. If a hearing is not requested, the Town will proceed with the removal and disposition of the materials without further notice to you. 1-28,30 9975

Once again, Tippy's got the inside scoop