Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
More Issues With Putnam Woods
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  More Issues With Putnam Woods Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 75 Guests

More Issues With Putnam Woods  This thread currently has 6,456 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Admin
January 8, 2009, 5:25am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
ROTTERDAM
Neighbors fear new home on lot at center of dispute

BY JUSTIN MASON Gazette Reporter

    Amedore Homes has again raised the ire of several Putnam Road residents after pitching plans to build a duplex between a condominium complex the company built and the former home of Aaron Mair.
    The developer submitted plans to the Rotterdam Planning Commission this week, calling for a split of the property, which is about two-thirds of an acre, off Putnam Road. One of the resulting parcels would then be rezoned from agricultural to two-family residential, allowing the construction of a four-bedroom duplex between the former Mair residence and Putnam Woods.
    Now, some of Mair’s former neighbors fear the town is poised to further change their street by allowing Amedore to build on the lot he acquired. Next door neighbor Patricia-Anne Green-Dehn said the proposed duplex will destroy the privacy of her home and further affect the groundwater issues she’s had since the condominium complex was built three years ago.
    “The only thing this fits in with is Amedore’s Putnam Woods,” she told the commission Tuesday. “It’s taking away the neighborhood’s feel.”
    Several commission members also expressed reservations about the project. Dan Brudos said the project appears as though it would remove a valuable buffer between the condominiums and the properties along Putnam Road.
    “They’ve got a nice buffer there with that lot and I’d be concerned to see that lost,” he said.
    The commission ultimately forwarded a recommendation to the Rotterdam Town Board to approve the zone change. Board members will first need to schedule a public hearing before acting on the project.
    Amedore Homes acquired Mair’s property after reaching an out-of-court settlement in October. Attorneys representing Mair and company president George Amedore Sr. declined to discuss the terms of their settlement, other than to say the lawsuit was amicably resolved.
    However, some terms of the agreement came to light after the zoning change was proposed. In addition to building the duplex, the developer plans to restore Mair’s single-family residence acquired in the settlement, project engineer Brett Steenburgh said.
    “The settlement was settled in Mr. Mair’s favor,” he told the commission Tuesday. “[Amedore] settled the lawsuit because of an easement issue he couldn’t resolve.”
    Mair sued the town of Rotterdam and Amedore Homes in November 2006, claiming the company had unlawfully developed within his long-standing property easement when it built Annabelle Place, the sole access point for the 52-unit Putnam Woods condominium complex. Mair also claimed Amedore’s project to build Putnam Woods had changed the area’s water table, which in turn caused foundation damage and flooding inside his home.
    Schenectady County real estate records show Amedore Homes purchased Mair’s property in November for $185,000, which is about $11,000 greater than the assessed value. Mair, a staunch critic of the Putnam Woods project, had initially demanded $200,000 in compensation from the town and that Amedore remove all of the structures built within his easement, including the development’s private road, septic pumping station, and electric service.
    Mair’s argument about his easement was upheld by a Schenectady County Court ruling in October 2007, but his claim against the town was dismissed. The matter was scheduled to go to trial this year before the settlement was reached.
    Mair wouldn’t discuss any part of the settlement, other than to acknowledge he transferred the property to Amedore, the father of state Assemblyman George Amedore Jr. He spoke with anger about ................http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar00900
Logged
Private Message
senders
January 15, 2009, 9:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Oh boy,,,,,,here we go.....Amedore needs to just walk away.....make nice shrubs.....PLLLLLLLEEEASE.......JMHO.....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 22
MobileTerminal
January 15, 2009, 9:33pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
More accuracy...

Quoted Text
by allowing Amedore to build on the lot he acquired.


Quoted Text
Schenectady County real estate records show Amedore Homes purchased Mair’s property


Note, the CORPORATION purchased it, not George Amedore, individual.

The corporation, Amedore Homes, is not a "he" - it's an IT ... George Amedore happens to own the corporation, but George didn't acquire it, the corporation did.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 22
biaggio
January 16, 2009, 4:15am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
594
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -0
Time Online
13 days 20 hours 46 minutes
and your point is ??
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 22
Salvatore
January 16, 2009, 1:50pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Georgie boy is up to his tricks again
Logged
E-mail Reply: 4 - 22
bumblethru
January 16, 2009, 2:19pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from 147
More accuracy...
Note, the CORPORATION purchased it, not George Amedore, individual.

The corporation, Amedore Homes, is not a "he" - it's an IT ... George Amedore happens to own the corporation, but George didn't acquire it, the corporation did.
I persoanlly take no issue with George Amedore, BUT....Let's use the metroplex for an example here. The plex is a 'thing/authority' of it's own...but..Ray Gillen is the face of this 'authority'. So Gillen is the one who will get hammered. I guess Mr. Amedore can expect the same thing, rightfully or not.

And what makes it even more complex is that the plex isn't called 'the METRORAY' or 'METROGILLEN'. Whree as Amedore Homes IS his name!  And yet similarly, Amedore and Gillen DO make the calls that have an end result.

I hope I'm explaining this so it can be understood.  



When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 22
MobileTerminal
January 16, 2009, 3:20pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Absolutely agree with you Bumble - but for M'plex, Gillen is there making the decisions on a daily basis.  He's the one talking to the media.  In Amedore's case, George isn't even in the office most days - it's a company handling things (secretaries, etc)

Isn't that a little different?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 6 - 22
Kevin March
January 16, 2009, 4:41pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,071
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
88 days 15 hours 44 minutes
Quoted from 147
Absolutely agree with you Bumble - but for M'plex, Gillen is there making the decisions on a daily basis.  He's the one talking to the media.  In Amedore's case, George isn't even in the office most days - it's a company handling things (secretaries, etc)

Isn't that a little different?


I agree also, but think about this, MT.  The President (whoever it is, whenever it is) is always responsible for what happens in the country, no matter where he is or what is happening...or is George Bush not responsible for helping the country come back after 9/11 since he was in a classroom reading to children at the time of the attacks?  Responsibility comes with the position, especially when your name goes along with everything that is done in the company's (or country's) name.  In this light, if you're going to blame anybody for 9/11 happening, since the President isn't in the office every day, wouldn't his staff and those working under him (specifically Congress) be the ones to blame?  And if so, why haven't we done so for the past 7+ years?


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 7 - 22
Shadow
January 16, 2009, 5:02pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The Congress was guilty of helping to dismantle the military and our intelligence gathering group during the Clinton administration.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 22
Admin
March 3, 2009, 7:30am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
ROTTERDAM
Residents oppose more development Flooded basements, shifting foundations among complaints expressed to officials

BY JUSTIN MASON Gazette Reporter
Reach Gazette reporter Justin Mason at 395-3113 or jmason@dailygazette.net.

    Marie Miklic remembers when the backyard of her Putnam Road home was buffered by woods.
    But then Amedore Homes built a 52-unit condominium complex behind her property. Soon after the project broke ground, the few remaining trees she had between her home and the development began to fall.
    “Then in one storm, about 30 trees came down,” she said. “Now the horizon has drastically changed.”
    Miklic and other residents along the road believe the condominiums caused a shift in the water table, which has since thinned the sparsely populated woods that were left behind in wake of the development. They say they now contend with flooded basements, shifting foundations, sinkholes in their yards and other problems since construction began in 2005.
    Rotterdam officials heard a number of other disgruntled residents during a recent public hearing for two separate zone changes that would allow further development on Putnam and Curry roads. In each instance, the residents argued their homes were already negatively affected by development.
    “For once I’d like to see the town say ‘no’ to developers and say ‘yes’ to the residents you already have,” Miklic said.
    Peter Amedore, an executive with Amedore homes, declined to comment Monday.
    Residents along Putnam Road are objecting to a zoning change that would allow Amedore Homes to build a four-bedroom duplex between the former home of Aaron Mair and the nearby condominium complex. The project was also protested by a Putnam Woods resident, who argued the project could have unintended consequences on the condominiums, such as a degradation of the development’s sole access road by heavy construction equipment.
    “We’ve already put Amedore on notice that we have a problem now,” resident Frank Adams told the board. Patricia-Anne Green-Dehn of Putnam Road said the town shouldn’t even consider the zone change because the property is too small to develop without a variance. She said the 15,340-squarefoot lot lacks both the size and the road frontage for the project Amedore Homes is planning.
    “They’re squeezing a duplex onto a piece of property where it doesn’t fit,” she said. “It’s going to make things difficult for everyone living there.”
    Residents also expressed concern about a change of zone along Curry Road to a new classification that allows for the construction of bungalows, town houses and condominiums on lots smaller than 15,000 square feet. Delzotto Builders is seeking the change to construct eight upscale houses on three acres of land zoned single-family off Curry Road near the dead end at Amsterdam Avenue.
    Some said they were concerned the development would detract from the character of the area, while others worried it might add to water table problems that seem to get worse in the area each time there is more construction. Amsterdam Avenue Resident Albert Raymond said he fears the project will be built, but the builder won’t be held accountable for future issues that may result.
    The board is expected to vote on both proposals this month. If the zone changes are approved, the proposals will go back to the Planning Commission for site plan approval.
    Supervisor Steve Tommasone assured residents the town will try to limit any impacts before approving a zoning change. For instance, he said.....................http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar01001
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 22
Shadow
March 3, 2009, 8:30am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The town should heed these warnings as the residents concerns are now in writing so if the town approves more development and there are problems in the future it will be grounds for a lawsuit. The town does not do enough research into potential problems such as a hydrological study which should be done in known wet areas which in my opinion is a form of neglect.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 22
Michael
March 3, 2009, 8:42am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
533
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -2
Time Online
8 days 6 hours 23 minutes
The Planning Commission expressed concerns.
The residents expressed concerns.
Supervisor Tommasone assures us that the Town will try to limit any impacts before approving a zoning change?  Is he kidding me?  I'm curious what he means.

These development concerns are not new.  How many people have to be adversely affected by a rising water table before the Town understands?

If these zoning changes are approved, it is a clear and dangerous signal that developer interest reigns supreme over resident interest.


No New Taxes.
Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 11 - 22
Shadow
March 3, 2009, 9:06am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
I agree Michael, the town is still being run just like it was 50 years ago and the town is still making the same mistakes at the residents expense with the developers calling all the shots. I thought we as residents were finally going to get transparency, accountability, and protection but I guess those ideals all went out the window when the developers objected to that type of government. I fear what Supervisor Tommasone means is he'll have the developers engineer assure us all that everything will be ok if the development goes thru IMHO.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 22
LeftTurnClyde
March 3, 2009, 11:40am Report to Moderator
Guest User
who do you mean when you say the town is making mistakes???? TOMMASONE!!!!!!!!
Logged
E-mail Reply: 13 - 22
Shadow
March 3, 2009, 1:50pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
If the shoe fits Steve will have to wear it good or bad.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 22
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread