Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
State Audit of Sch'dy Metroplex / Bonding Limit
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  State Audit of Sch'dy Metroplex / Bonding Limit Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 46 Guests

 Should Metroplex be audited by NYS?
Yes (20 votes)
100%
No (0 votes)
0%
Undecided (0 votes)
0%
20 Votes Total
You must login or register to be allowed to participate in this poll

State Audit of Sch'dy Metroplex / Bonding Limit  This thread currently has 74,175 views. |
19 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 » Recommend Thread
Brad Littlefield
January 15, 2008, 11:44am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Thank You. The following information has been submitted:


Form submitted on Tue Jan 15 12:28:23 2008

Personal Information:
   Mr Bradley Littlefield
   197 Eaton Corners Road
   Delanson, NY 12053
   Phone: 518-XXX-XXXX
   Email: XXXXXXXX

Comments:
Dear Attorney General Cuomo,

In early December 2007, I penned a letter to the New York State Office of
the State Comptroller's office requesting that an independent and
comprehensive audit of the operations and the finances of the Schenectady
Metroplex Developement Authority (a public authority) be performed by the
state.  I spoke w/ Mr. Kenneth Madej who informed me that a state audit has
never been conducted of the "Metroplex" since it's inception
ten years ago, despite the law that stipulates that public authorities
must be audited by the state at a minimum of once in every five years.

As the highest law enforcement authority in New York State and an
advocate for consumers and residents, I ask that you investigate and
determine why the Metroplex has apparently been exempt from the
provisions of the law regarding the auditing of public authorities.
Many of the taxpaying residents of Schenectady County share my questions
and concerns about the application process, the criteria for funding
decisions, the awarding of public revenues in the form of grants to
private citizens, the distribution of funds to the various municipalities of
Schenectady County, and, most importantly, the return on the
taxpayers investment of public revenues to finance private businesses.

I thank you in advance for the courtesy of your reply.

Respectfully,

Brad Littlefield




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to the Office of the Attorney General's Home Page


I submitted, by web post, the correspondence above to New York State Attorney General Cuomo.  Confirmation of the receipt of my correspondence was acknowledged by email (below).  I believe that it is time to escalate the question/issue as no satisfactory response has been received to date from the New York State Office of the State Comptroller.  I will post any response that I receive from the Attorney General's office.



Quoted Text
From: webmaster@smtpgw.oag.state.ny.us
To: XXXXXXX
Subject: Comments to AG from Web Site
Date: Jan 15, 2008 12:28 PM
Hi Bradley,

Thank you for sending your comment to the Attorney General.

This is an automatic confirmation of your e-mail to us.  Please do not respond to
this message.

We received your message on Tue Jan 15 12:28:23 2008

Thanks,
New York State Attorney General Web Team
Logged
E-mail Reply: 15 - 271
Admin
February 1, 2008, 5:03am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
http://www.dailygazette.com
Quoted Text
Metroplex critic doesn’t know what he’s talking about

    This is in response to Brad Littlefield’s Jan. 8 letter asking for an audit of Metroplex by the state comptroller’s office.
    Each year Metroplex conducts an annual audit, which is submitted to the comptroller’s office for review. Copies are also submitted to the state and county legislatures, and they are also posted at our Web site at http://www.schenectadymetroplex.org
    Metroplex is covered by the Public Authorities Accountability Act. All board meetings are open to the public and are broadcast on Channel 16. All projects that involve a commitment of more than $500,000 in funding require a public hearing. All contracts above $25,000 require approval by the board in public session. While board Chairman Ray Gillen is authorized to approve contracts for less than $25,000, he has made it a practice to submit all contracts to the board for approval. Metroplex also must maintain excellent finances as we are rated by credit agencies. We have a current bond rating of A.
For many years, Schenectady operated with a private economic development group that had no audited financials and very little accountability. I know, as I was a member of the board of that group, and resigned my board seat over concerns about the direction of the organization. This private group is no longer the lead agency in economic development.
Metroplex is a major partner in a county economic development team that is accountable, results-oriented and successful.
BRADLEY G. LEWIS
Schenectady
The writer is vice chairman of the Metroplex board and is an economics professor at Union College.     

Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 271
JoAnn
February 1, 2008, 7:24am Report to Moderator
Administrator Group
Posts
2,047
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 19 hours 27 minutes
I want to first say that I think the Gazette could have chosen other words to title this article.

And with that said, I have a question.  Do all Authorities, such as the Thruway Authority have to follow the same guidelines? Such as what Mr. Lewis stated:
Quoted Text
Each year Metroplex conducts an annual audit, which is submitted to the comptroller’s office for review. Copies are also submitted to the state and county legislatures, and they are also posted at our Web site at http://www.schenectadymetroplex.org  
If the Thruway Authority has submitted the same annual audits,, they were still subject an external audit. Wouldn't this be true for the Metroplex as well?
Logged
Private Message Reply: 17 - 271
Shadow
February 1, 2008, 8:07am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
An audit by the organization and submitted to the state is the same as having the fox guard the hen house or the PBA investigating the police department.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 18 - 271
Brad Littlefield
February 1, 2008, 9:46am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Mr. Lewis failed to comprehend the statements contained in my Letter to the Editor of the Daily Gazette which included one in which I acknowledged that there are self-directed annual audits of the Metroplex.  He doesn't agree that an independent and comprehensive audit conducted by the New York State Comptroller's office, that provides full accountability of the operations and the finances of the Schenectady Metroplex Development Authority (of which he is vice chairman) is not only in the interests of the tax paying residents of Schenectady County, but is also required by the law that governs state audits of public authorities.

I had expected a letter to be written by Metroplex Chairman Gillen and published by the Daily Gazette.  I guess that another insider on the Metroplex board was delegated the task.  Mr. Lewis doth protest too much.  Is he concerned about what an audit by the New York State Office of the State Comptroller may reveal?

The campaign continues.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 19 - 271
bumblethru
February 1, 2008, 12:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
I'm sure that the Thruway Authority does the same thing as the Metroplex in regards to their own internal audit and YET the Thruway Authority was audited. We are just asking, as taxpayers for a state audit. Now is that really too much to ask for in this great overtaxed state we live in?
And besides, that is the job of the Comptroller and the Attorney General. That's what we pay them to do!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 271
bumblethru
February 1, 2008, 1:13pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors
SchenectadyMetroplex Development
Authority

We have audited the accompanying statements of net assets of Schenectady Metroplex
Development Authority(a New York public benefit corporation) as of December 31, 2006and 2005,
and the related statements of revenues, expenses, and changes in net assets, and cash flows for the years
then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibilityof the Authority’s management.  Our
responsibilityis to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in the United
States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of SchenectadyMetroplex Development Authorityas of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages 2 through 7is not a required part of the basic
financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board.  We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries
of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information.  However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it.

Bollam, Sheedy, Torani & Co. LLP
Albany, New York
June25, 2007

http://www.schenectadymetroplex.org/downloads/2006%20Metroplex%20Audit.pdf


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 21 - 271
CICERO
February 1, 2008, 5:31pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
Metroplex critic doesn’t know what he’s talking about

    This is in response to Brad Littlefield’s Jan. 8 letter asking for an audit of Metroplex by the state comptroller’s office.
    Each year Metroplex conducts an annual audit, which is submitted to the comptroller’s office for review. Copies are also submitted to the state and county legislatures, and they are also posted at our Web site at http://www.schenectadymetroplex.org
    Metroplex is covered by the Public Authorities Accountability Act. All board meetings are open to the public and are broadcast on Channel 16. All projects that involve a commitment of more than $500,000 in funding require a public hearing. All contracts above $25,000 require approval by the board in public session. While board Chairman Ray Gillen is authorized to approve contracts for less than $25,000, he has made it a practice to submit all contracts to the board for approval. Metroplex also must maintain excellent finances as we are rated by credit agencies. We have a current bond rating of A.
For many years, Schenectady operated with a private economic development group that had no audited financials and very little accountability. I know, as I was a member of the board of that group, and resigned my board seat over concerns about the direction of the organization. This private group is no longer the lead agency in economic development.
Metroplex is a major partner in a county economic development team that is accountable, results-oriented and successful.
BRADLEY G. LEWIS
Schenectady
The writer is vice chairman of the Metroplex board and is an economics professor at Union College.  



Ladies and Gentlemen.......Please...... Do not pay any attention to the man behind the curtain.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 271
bumblethru
February 2, 2008, 7:01pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
No...Mr. Lewis is hiding behind his titles...vice chairman of the Metroplex board and is an economics professor at Union College.  Bollam, Sheedy, Torani & Co. LLP do not actually 'audit' the Metroplex. They just put the information given to them BY the Metroplex into an audit format and submit it to the proper authorities. As taxpayers and as Brad has stated, the taxpayers are just requesting an independent audit by the state. Just like they did for the Thruway authority.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 23 - 271
bumblethru
February 2, 2008, 7:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
May I also say that there are incentives for 'new' businesses to open up shop in certain areas of Schenectady County. They are called 'Empire Zones'. This was put into place to give new business a tax break if they located in those areas. Well we all know that the Rotterdam Industrial Park is one which did benefit the town with the Railex and the Price Chopper Freezer and Fedex.

But what about the downtown area of Schenectady? I believe that is also considered an Empire Zone. Now Villa Italia moved out of Rotterdam and 're-located' their already lucrative business to Broadway in Schenectady. Villa Italia is considered to be in this Empire Zone now which allows them the tax breaks. The Golub Office complex will be doing the same thing when they move to their new location in Schenectady.

So what is going on, is that successful, long standing businesses that have been contributing 100% to the tax base are now being lured to the downtown area specifically for the tax break. Hence, actually losing tax money. So can someone explain the rational to me? Aren't we really just robbing Peter to pay Paul, so to day? I may be seeing this in the wrong light and need some correction.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 24 - 271
Kevin March
February 3, 2008, 10:23am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,071
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
88 days 15 hours 44 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru



So what is going on, is that successful, long standing businesses that have been contributing 100% to the tax base are now being lured to the downtown area specifically for the tax break. Hence, actually losing tax money. So can someone explain the rational to me? Aren't we really just robbing Peter to pay Paul, so to day? I may be seeing this in the wrong light and need some correction.


They don't care about Peter if they can show that Paul is doing so much better.  And guess what...Peter's broke.  (30,000 people with Peter's broke.)  Oh well, at least Paul's doing good.



Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 25 - 271
Brad Littlefield
February 3, 2008, 10:00pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
I would welcome any of you who disagree with Mr. Lewis's assertions and who support my call for the New York State Comptroller's Office to perform an independent and comprehensive audit of the Schenectady Metroplex Development Authority to write a Letter to the Editor of the Daily Gazette.  The point that several of you have made regarding the NYS Thruway audit by the Comptroller's office as being similar is valid.  Why is the Metroplex exempt from the state law that requires public authorities to be audited at a minimum of once every five years?  (I was told of this law by someone in government, I will have to find the exact legislation).  Self-directed audits are, as Shadow contends, "the same as having the fox guard the hen house".  

It is interesting that the louder the outcry by the public becomes in support of the Metroplex audit and the more pressure that is brought upon the government to conduct the audit, the more defensive those on the Schenectady Metroplex Development Authority become.  Is there a reason for concern on their parts?  If not, would they not welcome the audit as a chance to show the public that the organization is being run efficiently and in accordance with the law?

It is unfortunate that the two daily newspapers in the Capital District do not have any legitimate investigative journalists.  Those who cover Schenectady County simply present the views, statements, and opinions of the Democratic majority in local government.  They act as cheerleaders for the current government rather than public advocates.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 26 - 271
JoAnn
February 3, 2008, 10:07pm Report to Moderator
Administrator Group
Posts
2,047
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 19 hours 27 minutes
Quoted Text
Is there a reason for concern on their part?  If not, would they not welcome the audit as a chance to show the public that the organization is being run efficiently and in accordance with the law?

Because you are treading on sacred ground where no one has gone before.  In part it boils down to a "how dare you question THE AUTHORITY".
Logged
Private Message Reply: 27 - 271
senders
February 4, 2008, 8:22am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
The thruway authority has not removed their foxes from the hen house---maybe they consider their foxes more like Robin Hoods?????


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 28 - 271
CICERO
February 4, 2008, 8:47am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
This scene reminds me of  "The Wizard" Ray Gillen, and Schenectady is his Oz.  Dorothy, Tin Man, and Scarecrow represent the Schenectady(Oz) county residents.  The Cowardly Lion represents our newspapers.





Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 29 - 271
19 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  State Audit of Sch'dy Metroplex / Bonding Limit

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread