http://www.dailygazette.com

Quoted Text

Wis. bill would set rules for pet custody
BY P.J. HUFFSTUTTER The Los Angeles Times

   MADISON, Wis. — Talk about treating Fido like one of the family: Wisconsin legislators have introduced a bill that outlines how divorcing couples and the courts should handle custody battles over pets.
   The bill would let couples specify, among other things, visitation rights and the right to move the animal out of state. If the feuding spouses can’t agree on what to do with the pet, the solution is simple: A judge can either pick a spouse or ship the pet off to a local humane society facility or similar shelter. Whoever gets there first owns the dog, cat or even goldfish. If they wait too long, someone else could adopt their beloved animal or, depending on the shelter’s policies, it could be euthanized.
   “Traditionally, the courts treat pets like pieces of property,” said Republican state Sen. Carol Roessler, co-author of the bill. “People might have an emotional tie to a family antique. But a dog is not a desk.”
   The bill, believed to be the fi rst of its kind in the nation, has tongues wagging here at the state capitol.
   On one hand, families are increasingly treating their furry friends as pampered children: Americans are expected to lavish $40.8 billion on their pets this year, with only $9.8 billion of that spent on veterinarian care, according to the American Pet Products Manufacturing Association.
   But the bill’s lead author, state Rep. Sheryl Albers — a Republican known for spearheading unusual legislation, including creating a state ballad, ensuring that gold bullion be exempt from sales tax and letting residents drive golf carts on city roads — says she is pushing the law because of her husband’s own messy 2003 divorce.
   Albers said her husband Steven and his former spouse bitterly fought over who should care for the family’s Labrador, Sammi. The kids wanted to keep Sammi, who was aging and suffered from incontinence. Neither parent, however, was clamoring to care for the dog full-time, Albers said.
   According to Albers and Dane County Circuit court documents, a judge ordered that as the three children split their time between mom and dad, so, too, should Sammi.
   “The dog did not travel well. It shed. It would get sick in the car,” said Albers, who is also an attorney. “It was not easy dealing with that dog.”
   Over time, she commiserated with friends about the situation and listened to tales of others who had wrestled with similar custody issues. When the dog died in February at age 17, Albers said, “it was a relief.”
   It also convinced her that the law needed to change.
   States traditionally consider animals to be property, so whichever spouse can establish ownership is granted custody. If ownership cannot be established, judges often try to figure out which person is the better caretaker and give the animal to him or her.
   The bill, introduced earlier in July, comes as both the public’s attitude and the legal community’s interest in the humane treatment of animals and their legal rights is growing.  

  
  
  

Oh dear, now they will be fighting over the animals too.

Those damn lawyers!