Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Bloomberg Switches Party Affiliation
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Bloomberg Switches Party Affiliation Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

Bloomberg Switches Party Affiliation  This thread currently has 1,031 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
June 20, 2007, 7:31am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
http://www.nypost.com
Quoted Text
SURPRISE PARTY SWAP FOR MIKE
By DAVID SEIFMAN, and MAGGIE HABERMAN

STRONGMEN: Bloomy, in L.A. yesterday with Arnold Schwarzenegger, was hailed by the Governator as an "excellent" '08 candidate.June 20, 2007 --

Mayor Bloomberg took his biggest step toward a White House run - and potentially plunged the 2008 contest into chaos - when he announced yesterday he's quitting the Republican Party to become an independent.

The stunning move could make Bloomberg, who has insisted he has no plans to run but has refused to completely rule it out, the third New Yorker involved in the White House race. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is the front-runner in the Democratic contest, while Bloomberg's predecessor, Rudy Giuliani, leads most polls for the Republican nomination.

"Although my plans for the future haven't changed, I believe this brings my affiliation into alignment with how I have led and will continue to lead our city," Bloomberg said in a statement last night, explaining why he had filed papers with the Board of Elections last Friday, changing his party registration.

"We have achieved real progress by overcoming the partisanship that too often puts narrow interests above the common good.

"As a political independent, I will continue to work with those in all political parties to find common ground, to put partisanship aside and to achieve real solutions to the challenges we face.

"Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles."

Political insiders familiar with Bloomberg's switch said it was triggered by the fact that some states where the billionaire mayor could compete as a self-financed candidate have rules making it complicated for people to get on the ballot as independents if they're registered to a party in their home states.

The mayor faced a mid-October deadline in order to be a registered independent by November 2008.
Logged
Private Message
Tony
June 20, 2007, 7:58am Report to Moderator
Guest User
That was a good decision for Bloomberg if he is going to run for the president. I don't think that the American voter want a democrat or republican so maybe this will work for him. Can he have Swartenager as a vice president being that he wasn't American born?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1 - 6
BIGK75
June 20, 2007, 9:59am Report to Moderator
Guest User
NO, Arnie cannot be Vice President, or even run for it, for the same reason that Slick Willie can't be vice.  Well, sort of.  Since Slick Willie was prez for 8 years already, he's ineligible for Prez or VP.  Arnie can't be considering he's not a natural-born citizen of the US.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_the_United_States
Quoted Text
Vice President of the United States
Eligibility
- The Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires the vice president to meet the same eligibility requirements as the president. That is, the vice president must be at least 35 years of age, a natural born citizen, and a resident of the U.S. for 14 years. The Twenty-second Amendment limits the president to only two terms in office. (Any period of service in the office of president, having succeeded from the vice presidency, counts as one term if it is for two years or more.) Thus, the maximum number of years a person may serve as president is ten years (two full four-year terms and one two-year term having succeeded to the presidency). Once a person is ineligible for the office of president, he is also ineligible for the office of vice president.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 6
Shadow
June 20, 2007, 4:46pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
I really don't care which party he wants to be associated with I wouldn't vote for him as I don't like the way he's run NYC since he's been Mayor.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 6
BIGK75
June 20, 2007, 10:29pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Anybody from NYC has to be taken with a grain of salt to see what they're actually worth.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 4 - 6
senders
June 21, 2007, 8:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
"Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles."


REALLY?


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 6
BIGK75
June 21, 2007, 10:03am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from senders

Quoted Text
"Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles."



REALLY?


I think they're saying that the real results are getting into the position, then you can do whatever you feel like and ignore everybody that got you in there.  We can ignore the partisan battles if / until we're getting the paychecks.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 6 - 6
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Bloomberg Switches Party Affiliation

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread