No rush to raise Metroplex debt cap or extend charter
Metroplex Chairman/CEO Ray Gillen wants the public authority’s charter extended five years, to 2033, and the bond cap increased by $25 million (April 1 story). At a time when county taxpayers are facing an estimated $16 million budget shortfall and the likelihood of an increase in property taxes, our elected “leaders” should demonstrate responsible leadership, exercise fiscal restraint and reject this spending request. The redistribution of public revenues by Metroplex in the form of financial grants and zero/low-interest loans to private business owners and developers has improved the appearance of some buildings in a several-block section of downtown Schenectady. This is exemplified by Proctors, which has received $9.5 million in financing through Metroplex-guaranteed bonds, in addition to hundreds of thousands of dollars in property tax revenues awarded by the county Legislature. However, despite the assertions by Gillen in a March 3 annual report, I question the “successes” of Metroplex and the return on the taxpayers’ “investment” as gauged by the creation of high-paying career jobs for which Metroplex can legitimately claim credit and by the revenues realized from the increased property tax base and sales tax receipts. Rather than requesting an increase in borrowing limits, Gillen and the Metroplex board should focus on recovering the funds invested in the Big House, Van Dyck Restaurant and the Cyclics Corp.; projects for which either the loan terms have been not been fulfilled or projected job creation has not yet been realized. Accountability of revenues and those who borrow them will provide funds for future projects. In a conversation with Kenneth Madej of the state Comptroller’s Office, I was informed that an audit of the Metroplex Development Authority has been scheduled [focusing on an evaluation of policies, procedures and internal controls]. This is the first independent and comprehensive audit performed by the state since Metroplex was created in 1999. The legislators should wait to address Mr. Gillen’s request until the audit is completed and the results are released. There is no need to act in haste, as the current Metroplex charter expires in 2028, leaving sufficient time to act, if warranted. While county residents struggle to make ends meet in their home budgets, they must reject government representatives who embrace a tax-and-spend mentality. BRAD LITTLEFIELD Delanson
Metroplex welcomes input from the public and we try to learn from and respond to valid criticism. However, Mr. Embarek Mesbahi’s letter complaining about his meeting with Metroplex (Gazette, April 3) offers more in the way of personal attacks than constructive criticism. First, the Gazette in editing the letter prior to publication apparently added a sentence saying that the meeting was held recently. The fact is that I met with Mr. Mesbahi over two years ago. The meeting focused on ways that we could help him fill up his empty building on Jay Street. He has owned the building for a number of years and it has been vacant for a long time. We have been successful in filling a number of empty storefronts on Jay Street in recent years and we wanted to help him with referrals and other opportunities to lease this storefront as quite a few businesses call our offices looking for retail and office space. We have not spoken to him since that meeting. His space is still empty while many other storefronts downtown have been filled. In other letters to the Gazette, Mr. Mesbahi has also criticized others involved in downtown redevelopment efforts. His letter is filled with accusations and attacks on those efforts. Metroplex staff work hard each day to improve the county’s economy. Most Schenectady County residents believe that things are moving in the right direction. Last year alone we added over 1,000 high-paying jobs to our economy. Mr. Mesbahi doesn’t think so and that’s his right. We still would like to fill his space on Jay Street which has remained empty for so long. RAY GILLEN Schenectady The writer is chairman of Metroplex.
I don't really know if Gillen writes his own defense statements, but if he or whomever does, have clearly been busy in the last few months having to defend himself and the metroplex. Things are beginning to surface little by little now. And they will continue to. So sharpen your pencil Mr. Gillen, cause more are on the way!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
we added over 1,000 high-paying jobs to our economy.
Oh? Care to elaborate on where those jobs ARE? Are they jobs you've relocated from other areas of the county? $2/hr waitresses in a bar? How many of those 1000 are still employed in Schenectady with companies that Mplex jumpstarted? How many of those "jobs" are by people that LIVE in Schenectady - or do they take their paychecks and run home to Colonie/Saratoga/Amsterdam to spend it?
Another thing that amazes me is that if you or I write a letter to the editor, it'll take a week or more (if it's even printed) to make it to the hallowed pages of the Gazette. Gillen/Stratton/Savage all seem to have magical pull and get their letters published within 24 hours. Wonder why that is. Hmm. And since when are "Letters to the Editor" used to discredit, disparage and defend the actions of another?
Quoted Text
He has owned the building for a number of years and it has been vacant for a long time.
So what? If he owns the building - and it meets city codes with the taxes current, it's none of your concern. If there's people interested in relocating to Mr Mesbahi's property, I'm sure they'll contact them on their own, instead of being "placed" there by a czar.
An interesting and informational paper entitled "Can a Private Corporate Analysis of Public Authority Administration Lead to Democracy?" written by Jonathan Rosenbloom is available at the link below. The paper appeared in the New York Law School Review.
I came across this paper on the internet while researching the legality of public authorities providing financial grants and loans to private individuals/businesses.
Several excerpts (below), provide some sense of the author's assessment:
"A 2001 study estimated that public authorities issue 75% of all state debt and 66% of all city and county debt. They are now second only to the federal government in the amount of debt they issue. As illustrated in states such as New York, where public authorities issue approximately 90% of the public debt, there does not seem to be an end in sight. New York is not alone. States are borrowing at increased rates and are now regularly borrowing to fill budget gaps." (p. 15 (866))
"The rationale for creating public authorities is rarely admitted to be an evasion of the referendum requirement" (p. 17 (867))
"With the board and officers, public authorities take on a quasi-public status and are not bound by many of the restrictions applicable to typical public agencies such as civil service, environmental, land use, and procurement laws and regulations. They are also subjected to little oversight and have the power to determine their own policies and budgets. Many public authority budgets are not included in state budgets at all or, at best, are only attached separately, as addenda. Because they are free from many oversight and accountability measures, public authorities are often empowered to perform tasks other government entities would not, or could not, perform due to various social and political pressures." (p. 17 (867))
"The analysis showed evidence that public authorities are inefficient, often resulting in poor finances and increased taxes; and at worst, it showed that they are ripe for graft, favors, abuse and corruption" (p. 66 (917))
The Schenectady Metroplex is evidence enough that they just don't work. Clearly not in the best interest of the taxpayer. Nor to certain private businesses. And Mobile, you hit everything right on the head. Where are these 1000 jobs? And like I've stated before....how many family members are employed by Villa Italia? Where are all of the high paying jobs that were promised 10years ago. And moving the Golub office complex to the 'city' is NOT job creation.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
The Metroplex has been sporting the idea for a decade that it came into existence to create jobs. Well that is poppycock. Railex and Fedex could have accomplished the same end result WITHOUT Gillen and the Metroplex. Galesi has enough muscle to have pulled it off himself. The Metroplex and Gillen and Savage and the rest of the gang have become nothing more than a very expensive taxpaid marketing group.
Thank God for people like Mr. Embarek Mesbahi who speaks out. There should be more like him. Most are afraid of intimidation. The Metroplex needs to be desolved ASAP before they do more damage to the residents of Schenectady County.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
I just wonder...how many letter's do you think that people such as Mr. Mesbahi write that get sent into the Gazette just get thrown into the "discard" pile? And is this ever the case for Mr. Gillen? Or is the fact that the Gazette is working with the Schenectady (city or county, take your pick) Democrats and they will post anything that Mr. Gillen writes as it's absolute fact that anything that Mr. Gillen states is gospel? And has Mr. Gillen ever admitted that the Metroplex has made any mistakes?
I think that we need to fight to get Metroplex shut down as quickly as possible and the tax money returned to the residents of Schenectady County, as we live in a Republic, where everyone should have a voice, not in a Communism where things should be taken from all (sales tax) and redistributed to those who are determined by a select few to be worthy to get the money.
Anything the public says that Mr. Gillen doesn't agree with, I'm sure, would be considered a personal attack, and not constructive criticism. There is no such thing as constructive criticism if the person who is on the receiving end of the criticism doesn't try to listen and turn around and actually use it to make improvements.
And do we believe Mr. Mesbahi’s statement that the meeting was recent, or do we believe Mr. Gillen's statement that the meeting was 2 years ago? I know that the Gazette will actually talk to the writer of a letter before they edit it (as they recently have with mine). Maybe we could get in contact with Mr. Mesbahi and find out?
SCHENECTADY Company wants to restore old buildings Preservationists feared State Street structures would be razed BY KATHLEEN MOORE Gazette Reporter
Two unusual historic buildings left to rot downtown are finally being restored. Focus Construction has purchased the Morgan Building at 322 State St. and its owner says it has an option to buy the Foster Building, at 508 State St. The company plans to spend $2.3 million repairing both structures. And unlike the previous owners, who did no work to maintain the buildings, Focus has already started fixing the Foster Building’s roof and has applied for the many pricey permits needed to repair the Morgan Building, according to the company. Both buildings have unusual, century-old facades that have somehow survived the ravages of time intact. The Morgan Building, which was badly damaged in a fire last year and is difficult to repair because it abuts the railroad bridge, is one of just four buildings in the Capital Region with a cast-iron facade. The unusual, blueish facade was untouched by the fire and stands out even now, when the rest of the burnt-out building is covered with boards. The Foster Building has also been crumbling while the rest of downtown came back to life. But the intricate facade, which covers six stories with bouquets, leaves and other designs, is still in good condition. Foster has one of the most highly decorated terra cotta facades in the region. For a time, it looked like both buildings were heading toward demolition. The Morgan Building sat vacant for many years, housing a series of homeless men who climbed in the windows, drank, and on at least three occasions, set the place on fire. City officials were so pessimistic about the chance of anyone rehabbing it after last year’s fire that they lobbied for it to be destroyed. Historic preservationists begged them to give the owner a chance, and the city gave in after learning it would cost up to $250,000 to knock it down. The city pushed harder for restoration of the Foster Building, but officials estimated that it would take at least $1 million to fix it up. With another $1 million for the asking price, no one was interesting in taking on the project. Preservationists despaired, saying they were watching the slow death of an architectural treasure. But now, both buildings may be on the path to recovery. Although city officials emphasized that Focus Construction has taken on a huge task by attempting both projects at once, they praised the company for immediately starting work. “I have to give him credit,” said Metroplex Development Chairman Ray Gillen, who has been trying to market the Foster Building for more than a year. “We’ve been trying to get these building redeveloped and he’s out there. It’s very positive to see people taking on a tough rehab project, and these are both going to be tough.” He was referring to Jeffrey Civitello, owner of Focus Construction. AGGRESSIVE SCHEDULE Officials were also startled, but gratifi ed, to hear the company’s aggressive schedule for the Morgan Building. Work is slated to take just 120 days. “Wow,” said Corporation Counsel L. John Van Norden. “We waited more than a year with the other owner — we’re still trying to prosecute him.” Garner Properties LLC faces multiple code violation tickets. Civitello said he will work quickly because long projects cost more money. “The difference is, I’m spending my money,” he said. “Developers who get the building for $1 and have Metroplex paying their way can take their time.” He bought the Morgan Building for $37,000 and plans to spend another $200,000 on the rehab. The first floor will be converted into a cafe, while the second floor will be marketed as commercial space and the top floor will become apartments. He expects a cafe to do well. “There’s really no place to eat after 9, 10 o’clock at night,” Civitello said. “With all the bars and the bus stop right there, I figure that’s a sure shot.” The sale price, reached at auction, was so low that he will have no trouble financing the repairs, he added. “At this stage, we can’t lose,” he said. Civitello is not receiving any aid from Metroplex, which has offered grants and loans on many of the major projects downtown. But Metroplex did not try to show the fire-damaged building and Gillen confirmed that his agency isn’t involved in Civitello’s project. It was not clear why — Civitello said he’d be happy to accept money from the agency. “We tried to hook up with the Metroplex, to be in their little crew of people … but they’re very selective, so what we’re doing is with private financing,” Civitello said. “If they have a project they want us to do, I’m happy to do it. Otherwise we’re going to have a cafe on the first floor.” Metroplex also does not appear to be supporting Civitello’s work at the Foster Building. Gillen said that he would continue to show Foster to prospective buyers until Civitello closes on the building. MONEY ON THE TABLE Civitello said he put $60,000 down on a $700,000 sale price and has a signed contract with the owners, but they agreed to a common rehab deal in which he does not close on the building until he finishes the most expensive repairs. That way, Civitello said, he can avoid the cash-flow problem that could result from paying a mortgage while also paying for the repairs. If the owners sell to someone else, they must pay him for his work. Gillen expressed some confusion, saying he has another prospective buyer lined up to view the building today and has not been informed of any signed contracts. He acknowledged that one of the building’s two owners asked him to stop showing the building because Focus had agreed to a deal, but said it’s good business to keep showing the building until someone actually buys it. Civitello, who plans to put at least $2 million of his own money into the project, said he still wants to work with Metroplex on it. “My options are wide open to do what makes them happy,” he said. “There are seven storefronts and they’re beautiful.” He plans to put 26 upscale housing units on the upper floors while turning the second floor into class-A office space. And even though the building sat vacant for nine years, Civitello said, most of it is in good shape. “We started working there a couple weeks ago. We took down the dropped ceilings — there’s beautiful vaulted ceilings,” he said. He expects the work will take 20 months, partly because he’s moving interior walls to turn single-room-occupancy units into classy, two-bedroom apartments. There’s also a lot of interior damage from water pipes that burst in 1999, but Civitello said it’s still head and shoulders above the fire damage at the Morgan Building. Although Gillen would not discuss Civitello’s plans for the Foster Building, he did offer some help on the Morgan Building. Civitello should apply for a facade grant for that project, Gillen said. “We welcome their interest,” Gillen added. “It’s important because it’s on the other side of the rail overpass, where we want to bring growth. It gets development in that direction.”
Yuuuup!! I may be wrong here but wasn't there an issue with this Civitello guy in the past?
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Researching at the Co Clerks office, there is a “Certificate of Discontinuance of Business” from Focus Construction, signed by Civitello in January of this year and notarized.
Now, tell me - if they (he) discontinued business, and there's no DBA or Corporation filed under that name - HOW can he (over)pay for these buildings??
Metroplex wants to give a person that's facing a jail sentance our tax dollars??