Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 10 Guests

Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance  This thread currently has 211,037 views. |
204 Pages « ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... » Recommend Thread
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
December 7, 2010, 1:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Vote YES on December 14


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2070 - 3057
biaggio
December 7, 2010, 1:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
594
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -0
Time Online
13 days 20 hours 46 minutes
Vote NO on Dec 14
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2071 - 3057
biaggio
December 7, 2010, 1:58pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
594
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -0
Time Online
13 days 20 hours 46 minutes
Vote NO on Dec 14
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2072 - 3057
AVON
December 7, 2010, 1:58pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from gadfly


REMS claims there will be no free rides. They insist that the tax proceeds would go solely to capital investments such as the five new
ambulances they intend to purchase. They state continue to bill insurance companies/Medicaid/Medicare to cover salary, benefits, etc.,
although I don't see how that will continue to cover rapidly rising costs of those payables.
They also state that they will not pursue billing/collection efforts with users who are uninsured or unable to pay. So basically, by their
presentation,
the tax will pay for their equipment, supplies, ambulances and anyone who can't or won't pay.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 2073 - 3057
gadfly
December 7, 2010, 2:00pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,421
Reputation
81.82%
Reputation Score
+9 / -2
Time Online
17 days 21 hours 55 minutes
Here's another item to think about...

I have always said that the biggest reason the FDs are supporting REMS tax is because they don't want REMS moving in with them....sharing very
expensive facilities...and millions of dollars in annual tax revenue.

I attended one of the REMS gatherings at the Curry Rd/ firehouse last week. Tony Jasenski delivered a lengthy dissertation about the history of
REMS...much like the irrelevant walk down memory lane he called a "presentation" the night of Mohawk's real presentation. Only this time he
mentioned something else...that REMS and other emt squads USED to share resources with the FDs, but they began to eat up more and more of
their budgets and couldn't afford them anymore.


This confirms two things I have always contended.

First, the firefighters are going all out to support a tax for REMS because they don't want REMS to end up moving in with them.

Second, the cost of that service will rise steadily and dramatically...and those increases would be reflected in a rising tax that REMS claims will
never go up. If the FDs could no longer afford to finance REMS then...imagine what would happen with that tax now.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2074 - 3057
huskyhowls
December 7, 2010, 2:03pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
240
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
1 days 18 hours 8 minutes
MB would definitely have a vote YES sign on her lawn.  Doesn't have one though because too few people would see it in the boonies.

How do we pay for general volunteer fire companies, but with tax dollars, right? I talked with a few of our good town fire company volunteers and they are supportive too.

REMS can be monitored on their finances and a good caregiver for all us.  I remember when REMS used to send the donation request in the mail.  The last one I got was for about $75.00.  So does it matter to me if it comes out of my direct pocket or funnels through town hall, NO!  At least this way everyone is paying the same fair share, not some of us donating the requested amount and others giving nothing when they can afford to give at least $75.00.

I gotta go with DVR on this one.



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2075 - 3057
gadfly
December 7, 2010, 2:11pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,421
Reputation
81.82%
Reputation Score
+9 / -2
Time Online
17 days 21 hours 55 minutes
Since the tax would be based on assessed property value, everyone will not be paying the same...especialy owners of multiple properties.
Donations are voluntary...taxes are not.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2076 - 3057
AVON
December 7, 2010, 2:16pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from huskyhowls
REMS can be monitored on their finances and a good caregiver for all us.  I remember when REMS used to send the donation request in the mail.  The last one I got was for about $75.00.  So does it matter to me if it comes out of my direct pocket or funnels through town hall, NO!  At least this way everyone is paying the same fair share, not some of us donating the requested amount and others giving nothing when they can afford to give at least $75.00.

I gotta go with DVR on this one.



           If it funnels through Town Hall, you have no choice.  If it comes out of your pocket, you have a choice.  So are you saying that you support REMS, but not an ambulance taxing district?  Almost everyone has health insurance they pay dearly for, Why would you pay twice for the same service??  Why are you concerned with everyone paying their fair share?  You should only pay if you need the service, not because it is fair for you to pay when others don't.  Please pay to have my driveway plowed because I don't want to!  Why would you settle for a lesser BLS provider for a cost when you can get ALS for no cost?  This mind set is troubling, but at least you are correct, you are right in step with DVR.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2077 - 3057
huskyhowls
December 7, 2010, 2:44pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
240
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
1 days 18 hours 8 minutes
Well was it ever proposed to going back to people making donations to support it?  Why can't it go back to being supported in this way.  Why does it have to be via taxing district?  

I support REMS. Primarily because it's roots are in Rotterdam. I'm one of those folks that still take pride in Rotterdam despite who sits in town hall.   I like my community and want to keep REMS around.

I wish the vote were more available to residents.  This could have been done in a more fair way.  The assessor's/receiver of taxes offices have a database with all property owners.  A fact finding type tally could have been mailed to all property owners and returned either in person or mail by a certain date without all this fan fair of an unfair voting system.

We could have really seen what the general populous wanted that way. I don't think this upcoming process is fair.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2078 - 3057
huskyhowls
December 7, 2010, 2:55pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
240
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
1 days 18 hours 8 minutes
We gotta start another thread if we want to talk about fair assessments Gadfly.  I just moved from the suburban part of town and my assessment was $30,000 more than the exact same house a street over.  Same exact size, same everything.  No reason for the difference.  Assessments are not fair in Rotterdam either.  I didn't challenge it because I knew I was moving to rural Rotterdam and frankly didn't think I was over-assessed.  I did think the house on the other street had a very questionnable assessment.  I guess I didn't know anybody in town hall that could adjust it for me.  Or maybe I wouldn't ever ask!

Bottom line, I think we need to feel the residents pulse for whether or not they want a local ambulance squad and how they want it funded.  I don't think this upcoming vote is how we find out that answer because I don't think enough of the folks eligible to vote really understand the issue.

Why can't we support it through donation?  What happened to that method of support?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2079 - 3057
Admin
December 7, 2010, 2:57pm Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
This was emailed to us for posting. Click on thumbnail to enlarge:

Photobucket


Logged
Private Message Reply: 2080 - 3057
AVON
December 7, 2010, 3:08pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from huskyhowls
Well was it ever proposed to going back to people making donations to support it?  Why can't it go back to being supported in this way.  Why does it have to be via taxing district?  

I support REMS. Primarily because it's roots are in Rotterdam. I'm one of those folks that still take pride in Rotterdam despite who sits in town hall.   I like my community and want to keep REMS around.

I wish the vote were more available to residents.  This could have been done in a more fair way.  The assessor's/receiver of taxes offices have a database with all property owners.  A fact finding type tally could have been mailed to all property owners and returned either in person or mail by a certain date without all this fan fair of an unfair voting system.

We could have really seen what the general populous wanted that way. I don't think this upcoming process is fair.


As I understand this, (and Gadfly could/should correct me if I'm wrong), we are essentially voting for or against an ambulance district.  The letter from the Town highlighted this.  So if the ambulance district vote passes, the service I would assume would have to go to bid as required by NYS Municipal Law.  Then REMS likely would be underbid by MAS and REMS would be out.  If the ambulance district is voted down, then MAS would be the likely provider.  I say this because the monies for REMS have been removed from the Town budget for next fiscal year, and REMS cannot survive without the supplemental funding.  To maintain REMS via donation is illogical based on the continued debt they carry, and the fact that all of their ambulances are allegedly in need of replacement.  You would have to raise upwards of $200,000 dollars and sustain that year after year, which I believe to be unlikely.  I see the problem as REMS needing far to much money right now just to be on the same playing field as MAS when the bid solicitations start, regardless of the vote outcome.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2081 - 3057
Shadow
December 7, 2010, 3:38pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
When the EMS was part of the FD there used to be fund drives that would cover every house in the fire district and if nobody was home they were left an envelope to mail in. Medical equipment, ambulances, training, and state mandated procedures like the ability to communicate with the hospitals while in transit all cost money. Being a paid ambulance service requires having a form of malpractice insurance in case of a mishap to a patient and we all know what that costs. When the EMS was operating under the supervision of the FD the EMT crews were all volunteer squads and because of the good samaritan law couldn't be sued so no need for special insurance. There are still too many unanswered questions about the fiscal health of REMS to even have a vote on the issue and it should be put off until all questions are satisfied.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2082 - 3057
AVON
December 7, 2010, 3:45pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
When the EMS was part of the FD there used to be fund drives that would cover every house in the fire district and if nobody was home they were left an envelope to mail in. Medical equipment, ambulances, training, and state mandated procedures like the ability to communicate with the hospitals while in transit all cost money. Being a paid ambulance service requires having a form of malpractice insurance in case of a mishap to a patient and we all know what that costs. When the EMS was operating under the supervision of the FD the EMT crews were all volunteer squads and because of the good samaritan law couldn't be sued so no need for special insurance. There are still too many unanswered questions about the fiscal health of REMS to even have a vote on the issue and it should be put off until all questions are satisfied.


I would agree with SHADOW on the vote out of fairness.  This continues to get uglier since the Town has indicated it was illegal for REMS to have kept the billed Paramedics monies.  Whether the ambulance district vote passes or not is almost irrelevant at this point.  Unfortunately REMS is in DEEP right now.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2083 - 3057
huskyhowls
December 7, 2010, 3:51pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
240
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
1 days 18 hours 8 minutes
Based on the letter just posted from Frank DelGallo and a few of these recent posts by those of you who are really knowing more of the facts, I don't think we are ready for a vote on this new taxing district.  

There's just too much murkiness and unanswered questions.

I like the idea of keeping REMS, but as a town, I don't think we should be voting on it yet.  If we want it, we have to fund it somehow.

I thank all of you who have responded to educate me as a resident and voter.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2084 - 3057
204 Pages « ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread