Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 19 Guests

Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance  This thread currently has 211,025 views. |
204 Pages « ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 ... » Recommend Thread
marymagdelene1234
November 30, 2010, 10:40am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,200
Reputation
58.33%
Reputation Score
+7 / -5
Time Online
3 days 8 hours 33 minutes
Personally I could care less which ambulance runs my a** to the hospital, however,
I do not want to have to pay a tax for it.  REMS needs a business manager, plain
and simple, one who can make them solvent without the extra burden on the taxpayer.

VOTE NO TO THE TAXING DISTRICT!  IT IS NOT WORTH IT!  IT WILL DRIVE
YOUR TAXES INTO OBLIVION!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1815 - 3057
Kevin March
November 30, 2010, 10:52am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,071
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
88 days 15 hours 44 minutes
Quoted from marymagdelene1234
Personally I could care less which ambulance runs my a** to the hospital, however,
I do not want to have to pay a tax for it.  REMS needs a business manager, plain
and simple, one who can make them solvent without the extra burden on the taxpayer.

VOTE NO TO THE TAXING DISTRICT!  IT IS NOT WORTH IT!  IT WILL DRIVE
YOUR TAXES INTO OBLIVION!


I agree.  I support REMS, I don't support a taxing district to fund them.  They already get paid from the insurance companies and the patrons, something that can't be said about Fire / Police service.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 1816 - 3057
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 30, 2010, 11:16am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Quoted from marymagdelene1234


Having your aunts dress in different outfits to get the same yes answer doesn't make
an entire community saying yes to REMS Ron. Time to get those glasses checked!



Making stupid comments like you do -- does nothing to improve your poor reputation.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1817 - 3057
B GAGE
November 30, 2010, 5:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
615
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -2
Time Online
14 days 10 hours 15 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
I think that most people supporting the tax district are either REMS employees or friends and relatives of those that are.

I think you are wrong
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1818 - 3057
tdonovan
November 30, 2010, 8:54pm Report to Moderator
Jr. Member
Posts
141
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -0
Time Online
3 days 6 hours 21 minutes
Quoted from Kevin March


Please clarify.  What do you mean, that the people who are against the taxing district are generally Mohawk employees?  That people don't want the taxing district because they have an invested interest in Mohawk?


Yes, I would like clarification too.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1819 - 3057
MobileTerminal
November 30, 2010, 9:48pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from tdonovan


Yes, I would like clarification too.  


Ms Donovan, are you stating you support the taxing district?  Is that the party line also?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1820 - 3057
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 30, 2010, 9:57pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
I don't think there is a particular "party line" on the referendum .. from either party.  

I have spoken to many people ... Democrats, Republicans, and those not registered in either of those or any
party  ---   and, so far,  I have not met a single person who opposes the Tax District.



George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1821 - 3057
MobileTerminal
November 30, 2010, 10:59pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
I wasn't talking to you, dirtbag.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1822 - 3057
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 30, 2010, 11:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
The main reason that the anti-REMS folks want to delay or cancel the vote -- is that they KNOW that most
Rotterdam property owners do NOT want to privatize this vital public service.

Fortunately,  we live in a democracy and on December 14 .. a majority of property owners will vote YES
for the tax district and we will secure the future of REMS once and for all.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1823 - 3057
MobileTerminal
December 1, 2010, 12:22am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Ya, about that mailing to every household / tax roll name.  Did that ever happen? No? Didn't think so.

Fixed? Yep.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1824 - 3057
senders
December 1, 2010, 5:05am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
I dont care about REMS.....folks it's another usurping of taxes and livelihoods made on the backs of taxes used as scare tactics and podium pucks year
after year after year......

are we THAT ignorant to think that REMS or anyother namesake with a taxing district of it's own will NOT cost more as the years march on?

I have absolutely nothing against, nor do I know the REMS staff personally, and I dont care to, I'm sure they are well qualified and trained
but the fact is the tax.....dont need it, dont want it.....let them be private....really really really private....no subsidies, no tax district.......

we cant afford mobile ER's......

when a country caters to the elder of itself it fails to move forward.....and that is what the politicos continue to do....use scare tactics about the poor poor
elderly who may need a ride to the hospital......DUH!.....of course our odds of needing an ambulance increase as we age......so plan for it......personally
dont whine about it.......

NO TAXING DISTRICT,,,,,GET OFF MY BACK


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1825 - 3057
CICERO
December 1, 2010, 7:32am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
The main reason that the anti-REMS folks want to delay or cancel the vote -- is that they KNOW that most
Rotterdam property owners do NOT want to privatize this vital public service.


I'm not Anti-REMS - as a matter of fact, if I needed an Ambulance, I would choose REMS.  REMS could bill my health insurance, and whatever wasn't covered by my insurance, they could bill me the balance AND I WOULD GLADLY PAY FOR SERVICES RENDERED.  But since I haven't been in the back of an ambulance in my life(but my insurance covers it), it would be insane for me to vote yes on creating a taxing district for a service I would be more than happy to pay for if I used it.  

This isn't anti-REMS - this is anti-unneccessary vote for unneccessary taxing district.  

If this vote isn't postponed - VOTE NO DECEMBER 14th.




Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1826 - 3057
AVON
December 1, 2010, 7:45am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
The main reason that the anti-REMS folks want to delay or cancel the vote -- is that they KNOW that most
Rotterdam property owners do NOT want to privatize this vital public service.

Fortunately,  we live in a democracy and on December 14 .. a majority of property owners will vote YES
for the tax district and we will secure the future of REMS once and for all.


         If the vote passes, it again is a clear indicator that Rotterdam continues to drink their septic tank water.  No plausible argument has been provided to support the tax district, to the contrary, there is a mountain of evidence to vote it down, being:
        1)  No cost to residents.
        2)  Revenue provided to the Town via property taxes and a payment.
        3)  Advanced Life Saving certification vs. Basic Life Support.
        4)  A long standing history of successful performance in the industry.

        Those in opposition to the tax district cover a wide spectrum of residents:
        1)  Those who legitimately can't afford any more taxes due to job loss and/or the economy in general.
        2)  Those who can easily afford the tax but are in opposition to the government imposing this unnecessarily.
        3)  Those who understand the tax district equates to a loss of control over the tax rate and the tax district's budget.

          For people to live their lives fretting over whether an ambulance will get to them in 10 minutes or 15 minutes is equivalent to worrying when you will get struck by a meteorite!  Typical mindset for Rotterdam sheeple . . . They don't know no difference!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1827 - 3057
Shadow
December 1, 2010, 7:53am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes

'The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program.' - Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1828 - 3057
Abe
December 1, 2010, 8:18am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Ambulatory transport charges are covered for folks who purchase health insurance privately or through their employers.  The majority of the cost is also paid for by Medicare.

http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/11021.pdf

The creation of the EMS tax district will result in most folks paying twice for the services; once to their insurer and once through their property taxes.
So, what are the true objectives of creating such a tax district?

- Providing coverage for the uninsured?
- Funding more quasi-public sector jobs?
- Redirecting revenues to the politically connected or other favored causes?  
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1829 - 3057
204 Pages « ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 ... » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Rotterdam Ambulance vs Mohawk Ambulance

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread